Dilbert readers – Please visit Dilbert.com to read this feature. Due to changes with our feeds, we are now making this RSS feed a link to Dilbert.com.

Naoki Hiroshima’s scary tale of losing his single-character Twitter handle has captivated the internet over the last few days. First, we heard the story of how Naoki was held ransom for the rare handle, then GoDaddy admitted it was partially responsible for giving out details that lead to the compromise.
Today, GoDaddy said on Twitter that it is changing its security policies to help protect against similar attacks of social engineering in the future:
@N_is_stolen Will do. We now require 8 card digits, lock after 3 attempts and deal with 2-factor authentication accounts differently. ^NF
— GoDaddy (@GoDaddy) February 1, 2014
The change may appear small on the surface, but should help prevent a repeat of the same story. It would be extremely hard for an attacker to gain 8 digits of a credit card (unless the whole card was stolen) and by locking the account after 3 attempts the company is protecting itself from attackers that would just hang up the phone and try again with a new representative.
Unfortunately, Naoki still hasn’t received his Twitter account back with the handle now in the grips of yet another squatter. The story isn’t quite over yet.
Image via Shutterstock

January saw the third full month of IE11 availability with Windows 8.1, the first full month of Firefox 26 availability, and the release of Chrome 32. The latest numbers from Net Applications show IE11 has finally passed IE10, as well as that IE and Chrome were the only winners overall last month.
Between December and January, IE gained 0.30 percentage points (from 57.91 percent to 58.21 percent), Firefox dipped 0.27 percentage points (from 18.35 percent to 18.08 percent), and Chrome gained 0.06 percentage points (from 16.22 percent to 16.28 percent). Safari meanwhile dipped 0.02 percentage points to 5.80 percent and Opera slid 0.05 percentage points to 1.28 percent.
At 58.21 percent, Internet Explorer is starting off 2014 off well, although still below its highest point last year (November was 58.36 percent). Last January, the browser went back above the 55 percent mark, and it looks like 2014 it’s going to aim for the 60 percent mark.
After phenomenal growth in December, IE11 grabbed an additional 1.09 percentage points (moving 10.42 percent to 11.51 percent), finally passing IE10. Its predecessor declined 1.77 percentage points to 9.28 percent, while IE9 slipped 0.04 percentage points to 8.92 percent.
IE8 unfortunately regained 0.61 percentage points, and it’s still the world’s most popular browser at 21.25 percent. IE11 continues to mainly steal market share from IE10 and IE9, since Windows XP users can’t upgrade past IE8.
IE7 somehow managed to gain 0.31 percentage points to 2.45 percent and IE6 also grew 0.11 percentage points to 4.54 percent. In September 2013, IE6 finally fell below the 5 percent mark, and thankfully it hasn’t regained all its losses.
At 18.08 percent, Firefox seems is hovering again; it has been at the 18 percent mark for the last seven months. Previously, it was in the 18 percent range all the way back in May 2008.
Firefox 26 gained another 6.82 percentage points to hit 13.42 percent. All the other versions lost share: Firefox 25 fell 6.92 percentage points, while Firefox 24, Firefox 23, and Firefox 22 lost a combined 0.18 points.
At 16.28 percent, Chrome continues to slowly recover its losses in 2013. Chrome 32 grabbed 6.79 percentage points, which would have been higher if it was available for a full month. All other versions lost share: Chrome 31 fell 6.22 points, while Chrome 30, Chrome 29, and Chrome 28 slipped a combined 0.16 points.
Net Applications uses data captured from 160 million unique visitors each month by monitoring some 40,000 websites for its clients. StatCounter is another popular service for watching market share moves; the company looks at 15 billion page views. To us, it makes more sense to keep track of users than page views (for more, see this post).
Nevertheless, for January 2014, StatCounter listed Chrome as first with 43.67 percent market share, IE in second with 22.85 percent, Firefox in third with 18.90 percent, Safari with 9.73 percent, and Opera with 1.30 percent. The only part everyone agrees on is that Safari and Opera are not in the top three.
See also – Windows 8.1 now up to 3.95% market share as it passes Vista, Windows 8 falls to 6.63%
Top Image Credit: Hugo Humberto Plácido da Silva

Bill Beardslee is the CEO of Magnolia Americas, where he is responsible for Magnolia’s business in the Americas, tending to clients, sales, lead generation and infrastructure.
It’s common for your developers to listen to a vendor proposal for a Content Management System (CMS) and say, “We could just build that ourselves.”
And the developers are right. Many companies have opted to use their internal talent to build a CMS, resulting in a terrific product. However, from seeing companies switch from their DIY solutions to our commercial CMS over the past decade, we now recognize some patterns.
Here are some of the things we’ve noticed about the pros and cons of rolling your own CMS versus buying a commercial off-the-shelf product.
Pluses
You can build to fit your business needs
One simple fact: No commercial CMS fits 100 percent of a business’s needs. There are always features or capabilities missing – or worse yet, there are architecture that interferes with what you really want to achieve.
For example, if your company is in the publishing business, the speed at which your organization can move is an important consideration. Your authoring environment needs to be streamlined to accommodate fluid UI manipulation, your DAM must support batch uploading of images and your authors need semantic content tagging.
Your content editors and publishers know exactly what they want and together with your engineering team, can create and test wireframes. And before you know it, you are on your way to creating a product that fits nearly every need in your business.
You control timing and pace
Tired of looking at a commercial vendor’s roadmap? 2016 can’t arrive soon enough, right? When you roll your own CMS, you dictate what features are added, what is deprecated, and when.
As your business enters new markets, your developers can customize or extend your CMS to meet new requirements. In fact, the business can begin development months before entering a new market, providing maximum impact at launch.
The ability to attack business opportunities with a commercial CMS are more difficult, particularly if you are waiting for “roadmap” features that will help your business.
You avoid the RFQ/RFI process and vendor negotiation
Choosing an enterprise CMS is a long process. Among other things, you’ll need to define requirements, issue RFQs, participate in meetings and demos with multiple vendors, perform your own due diligence, gather feedback from internal stakeholders and work through several rounds of negotiation with your vendor.
There is also the political element to consider. Purchasing a CMS is a significant outlay – sometimes so significant that is labeled a strategic buy.
As a high visibility requisition, upper management needs to be involved. And if you have a distributed publishing model, the number of stakeholders is often in the dozens. Some of your stakeholders will try to convince (or bully) the organization to believe that their requirements are more important than those of other business units.
At best this leads to internal wrangling, at worst it creates fissures between people. By rolling your own CMS, you bypass all of the above, saving you months of time, heartburn and potential political road kill.
For every dollar spent, you know the features you’re getting
CMS vendors are guilty of feature bloat. They pack a lot into their product, so that they can attract the widest customer base and stay on par with competition. Because you don’t usually need all of a vendor’s features, you end up overpaying for the features you do need.
If you build the CMS yourself, you can decide where to invest your development dollars, and you have complete control of what you’re getting for your money. And of course, you’ll also save on licensing fees.
It might give you a significant competitive advantage
You know your business better than any CMS vendor. Rolling your own CMS gives you the chance to apply all that hard-won expertise to your primary customer channel – your website.
A custom CMS can be a strategic asset. Your bespoke templating engine, workflow and customer experience can all combine to help create a game changer… just as Amazon did years ago.
Minuses
It takes time to build a robust CMS
If you’re developing a new CMS from scratch, it could take a year or two to achieve an acceptable level of quality and features. And when it’s released, there is a good chance your initial requirements will be outdated due to new technologies or shifting business requirements.
Using a commercial CMS could mean quicker deployment, and vendor upgrades keep your website aligned with current marketplace trends.
Congratulations. You are now in the CMS business
Once your new CMS is deployed, it’s no longer a skunkworks project, but a full-fledged product that needs a dedicated owner, product team, quality assurance, technical integrations with third-party applications and more.
Unlike a commercial vendor, there’s only one customer – your business – so you can’t amortize your development costs. Your product needs to be self-funded, year in and year out. You need to allocate time and resources to fix bugs, train users and integrate the system with databases and third-party services. If you’re not in the software delivery business, it will be a difficult competency to master.
The first version of your site isn’t the final version. You must invest to evolve the solution.
Successfully launching your enterprise website on your custom CMS isn’t the end, but the beginning. You’ll now be at the receiving end of a stream of new requirements from different stakeholders.
At the same time, you’ll need to educate yourself about new trends and technologies. If you can’t analyze all of this information, take positions on key trends and continually invest in evolving your CMS, chances are it will start losing users and soon thereafter, budget.
Significant maintenance and compliance costs may not be immediately apparent
In some verticals (like government agencies, finance and banking), your homegrown solution will need to comply with mandatory security, quality, accessibility and performance standards. Managing these needs requires a dedicated IT team, presenting new coordination challenges and adding to overhead.
A commercial CMS vendor will ensure compliance with industry standards, and offers additional technical support and services to ease maintenance.
Will your sustaining budget be protected?
Post-launch, your CMS team will be responsible for evolving the product. That takes time and budget. But what happens if the core business – the business that funds the CMS team – stumbles a bit; or, if there are higher priorities on a given year? The CMS team will likely be viewed as a cost center, and when push comes to shove, cost center budgets get cut first.
These are the most common patterns we’ve explored, but we’ve love to hear your side of the story and how your company arrived to its decision.

With the release of Windows 8.1 to the world in October, January was the third full month of availability for Microsoft’s latest operating system version, which was just enough time for it to pass Windows Vista in market share. While Windows 8.1 is certainly growing steadily and eating into Windows 8′s share, the duo only managed to end 2013 with 10 percent market share, barely impacting Windows 7.
The latest market share data from Net Applications shows that Windows 8 and Windows 8.1 barely made progress in January 2014, gaining a combined 0.09 percentage points (from 10.49 percent to 10.58 percent). More specifically, Windows 8 fell 0.26 percentage points (from 6.89 percent to 6.63 percent), while Windows 8.1 gained 0.35 percentage points (from 3.60 percent to 3.95 percent).
Meanwhile, Windows 7 dipped 0.03 percentage points (from 47.52 percent to 47.49 percent). Unlike in November, Windows 8 and Windows 8.1 combined did better than Windows 7 in both December and January.
Windows 8, which saw its biggest gain in August at 2.01 percentage points and its biggest loss in November at 0.87 percentage points, continues to slip. All Windows users are being encouraged to get the latest and greatest, and Microsoft is making the upgrade path to Windows 8.1 just a free download away for Windows 8 users.
Going back to earlier versions, Windows Vista fell 0.31 percentage points (from 3.61 percent to 3.30 percent), giving Windows 8.1 the opportunity to pass it. Windows XP meanwhile managed to regain some share after falling below the 30 percent mark at the end of 2013, increasing 0.25 percentage points (from 28.98 percent to 29.23 percent).
In 2013, Windows lost share every month except for March, July, and November. In January, Windows slipped 0.01 percentage points (from 90.73 percent to 90.72 percent). OS X gained 0.14 percentage points (to 7.68 percent), while Linux slipped 0.13 percentage points (to 1.60 percent).
Net Applications uses data captured from 160 million unique visitors each month by monitoring some 40,000 websites for its clients. StatCounter is another popular service for watching market share moves; the company looks at 15 billion page views. To us, it makes more sense to keep track of users than of page views, but if you prefer the latter, the corresponding data is available here (Windows 8 is at 7.34 percent).
See also – Windows 8 and Windows 8.1 pass 20% adoption on Steam and IE11 passes IE10 in market share, Firefox slips a bit, and Chrome gains back share
Top Image Credit: Mario Tama / Getty Images








